In partnership with

We all have theories about how the LinkedIn algorithm works. 

We get little inklings of insight. When a post does well, we think, "I GET IT." 

Then, the next day, the feed feels different again. 

So instead of trying to decode the algorithm, I've been paying attention to how different posts behave. 

And, I'm noticing two categories: Broadcast-style posts vs. conversation-first posts. 

From my experience, there's a time and a place for both.

Broadcast-style posts 

Broadcast posts are polished and complete. 

They:

  • Share clear insights

  • Teach a lesson or framework

  • Present finished thoughts

  • Position the writer as knowledgeable 

Think:

  • "Here's how I…"

  • "The biggest mistake people make is…"

  • "Everything you need to know about X." 

These posts build credibility and show people what you know. 

Here's an example:

Conversation-first posts 

Conversation-first posts, on the other hand, act differently. 

They:

  • Sound like someone is thinking out loud

  • Share a perspective instead of a conclusion

  • Feel closer to how people actually talk 

These posts often get strong engagement without ever asking for it, because the writing makes room for other voices.

 (Keep scrolling to learn how to write a conversation-first post) 

Here's an example: 

Why This Distinction Matters

When every post is broadcast-style, the feed starts to feel like a stage instead of a shared meeting ground. 

There’s a lot of presenting and not much talking. 

Conversation-first posts open the door to the room, letting people in. 

The strongest presences on LinkedIn mix both.

Use broadcast posts to establish authority and conversation-first posts to build connection.

When I'm ghostwriting for a client, I'll usually start with broadcast posts to establish their authority. 

Once people know who they are and what they're about, I shift to a blend with conversation-first posts.

That's when the real engagement kicks in, because now they're not just an expert, they're someone you want to talk to.

Help us make better ads

Did you recently see an ad for beehiiv in a newsletter? We’re running a short brand lift survey to understand what’s actually breaking through (and what’s not).

It takes about 20 seconds, the questions are super easy, and your feedback directly helps us improve how we show up in the newsletters you read and love.

If you’ve got a few moments, we’d really appreciate your insight.

When I step back and look at conversational posts, they include these elements:

  1. They drop people in the moment 

Conversation-first posts start where the thought began. 

The starting point could be:

  • a pattern you keep noticing

  • something that felt slightly off

  • a realization you didn't expect

  • a tension you haven't resolved yet 

You invite the reader into your thought process.

  1. They sound like something you'd say IRL 

This is where the eavesdrop test can help. If you wouldn't lean in to listen to your own post, you can't expect other people to.

  1. They share a POV, not just a lesson

These posts shift from teaching to explaining.

When a post sounds like a lesson, people tend to listen. But when it sounds like perspective, they start talking back.

  1. They don't end with a bow on it 

The conclusion can lose the conversation or keep it going. Broadcast posts feel complete while conversation-first posts keep the main message alive.

Next time you write a post, ask yourself: "Am I teaching or am I thinking out loud?" 

If you're teaching, make it polished and complete (broadcast-style). 

If you're thinking out loud, leave something unresolved. Share the tension, not just the takeaway (conversation-first). 

Both work. But knowing what you’re writing before you write it will strengthen the content.

PS If you find yourself staring at your posts, wondering "Is this done or should I keep editing?" you’ll love my Finish-the-Post Checklist. It gives you six quick checks so you can stop second-guessing and just publish. It's $5.

Recommended for you

No posts found